The CBDT had noticed
instances of undue influence / coercion on assesses to admit undisclosed income
during search or survey proceedings. Thus, CBDT has reiterated that any such
instance of undue influence / coercion shall be viewed by it adversely
Monday, February 16, 2015
Sunday, February 15, 2015
Misleading advertisement by developer on quality of services to be provided in housing project was unfair trade practice.
As decided in the case of Deepak Kumar Verma V. Shourya Towers (P) Ltd. [2015] 53 taxmann.com 98 (CAT).
Where the builders provided any misleading advertisement on quality of services to be provided in housing project, which are proposed to be provided by them, and if they could not provide such quality, it could be inferred that they were guilty of adopting unfair trade practice.
Where the builders provided any misleading advertisement on quality of services to be provided in housing project, which are proposed to be provided by them, and if they could not provide such quality, it could be inferred that they were guilty of adopting unfair trade practice.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)